.

Save Earth ...Seize Federal Reserve Founding Stock

m

new on 12/10/19 11 p.m. – to view, clean cookies & history &/or refresh w/ control F5

google search engine searches this site  


 Women & Pregnancies vs

Nuclear Industry Radiation 

In just 70 years, nuclear industry radiation has contaminated & harmed every living thing on Earth

01:47 PM Apr 5, 2011 -0223- Enraged nuclear expert: I’m personally furious at the government for this misleading information that downplays ingesting milk with iodine-131 – No mother should ever have to wonder if the milk she feeds her child might be harmful

02:12 AM Apr 3, 2011 -0204- Nuclear industry propaganda about low-level radiation [is safe] is absolute rubbish says physician who taught at Harvard Med School – It’s all about internal emitters (VIDEO) – It’s imperative that people understand that internal emitters cause cancer

08:36 PM Apr 4, 2011 -0216- U.S. Department of Energy: No level of radiation is without health risks – Nobody is talking about the fact that there is no safe dose of radiation.

No safe levels of radiation – standard based on ‘cost-benefit’, not safety

09:57 AM Jun 2, 2011 -0642- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says no such thing as safe levels of radiation – standard based on ‘cost-benefit’, not safety – Study from National Academy of Science says one out of five workers will get from cancer and suffer if exposed to IAEA-deemed allowable radiation level.

[Also see, Yes, nuclear fallout is in your breast milk, too, (here)]  

-8821.1- Fairewinds Comments on the EPA’s [lethal] Proposed Changes to the Protective Action Guidelines (here)

British shops to sell Fukushima radioactive baby food

(above) British shops to sell radioactive baby food & other produce from Fukushima under EU plan. (Also see, Secrets of Supermarket Meat & Fish, here)

Nov 27, 2019 – BRITISH shops will sell radioactive food grown near the Fukushima nuclear disaster site from next month under controversial EU plans. By Emily Ferguson — Brussels has forged a trade deal with Japan that removes controls over radioactivity levels on foods produced on the island following the 2011 nuclear disaster, The Telegraph reports. As a result, Britain will soon be selling goods from the disaster-hit area including baby food, breakfast cereals, fish crustaceans, meat and green tea. Current plans do not allow for the contaminated products to be labelled, meaning consumers will not be aware the food contains traces of radioactive substances. In recent years scientists have found faint traces of the radioactive isotopes Caesium 137 and 134 in food grown near Fukushima.But experts have deemed the food perfectly safe, with radiation levels being stringently monitored by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Tory candidate Neil Parish, who chaired the environment, food and rural affairs committee from July 2017 to November 2019, said the UK needed to review the policy after Brexit.

(above) British shops to sell Fukushima radioactive baby food – contaminated products will not be labelled 

Health help for kids & pregnant women needed

02:04 AM Oct 30, 2013 -6619- Intensive contamination areas by downtown Tokyo, officials – health help for kids and pregnant women needed (MAP)

04:42 PM Oct 30, 2013 -6622- Japan Professor: Pregnant women get free new houses if they move back to Fukushima – Physician/Mayor: Children being severely harmed, must be evacuated (VIDEO)

05:52 PM Aug 9, 2012 -3981- Pregnant women used for decontamination activity after Fukushima disaster – Report (VIDEO)

03:56 PM Jul 2, 2012 -3700- Fukushima Woman: Many are aborting babies - really happening - I know many women who were visibly pregnant then suddenly weren’t (VIDEO)

11:52 PM Nov 12, 2014 -8494- Japanese doctors threatened for revealing data on how bad Fukushima-related illnesses really are – Gundersen: We had pregnant sisters in Tokyo deliver two dead babies & one with deformities, that’s alive; Gov’t won’t disclose miscarriages or stillbirths around Fukushima (AUDIO)

07:18 PM Jun 11, 2011 -708- Fukushima health study: 100 mSv/yr okay for pregnant moms – Effects of radiation do not come to happy people – they come to people that are weak-spirited Soviets required mandatory evacuation at Chernobyl at 5 millisieverts.

12:44 PM Mar 4, 2014 -8061- Fukushima: Genetic defects and radiation-induced illness; baby of Navy sailor born with multiple genetic mutations, mother pregnant aboard USS Reagan for Japan rescue mission (VIDEO)

09:26 AM Oct 11, 2013 -6532- Doctors warn about radioactive substances from Fukushima coming to West Coast in 2014 – Consider keeping kids away from beach, perhaps pregnant women as well (VIDEO)

06:36 AM Apr 11, 2011 -0277- plus -0277a- Health risk from Fukushima fallout – U.S. west coast: 8-10 times more contamination – don’t drink rainwater; vulnerable groups – children and pregnant or breastfeeding women – avoid vegetables w/large leaves, fresh milk & creamy cheese

01:36 PM Jul 16, 2012 -3803- Birth defects and eating radioactive contamination - One mushroom eaten in affected areas may deliver as much radiation as hundreds of chest x-rays –  Ukraine show elevated birth defects of the brain & spinal cord – One mushroom eaten in affected areas may deliver as much radiation as hundreds of chest x-rays – This accumulation is most worrisome for pregnant women. Radiation is an agent that can not only cause birth defects, but alter the human genome with long-term effects on future generations, he stated – Ukraine shows elevated birth defects of the brain and spinal cord.

04:58 PM Apr 9, 2011 -0269- Official in BC, Canada connects with pregnant moms and those with newborns seeing radiation levels in rain rise steeply – community health at stake – no-drink order after radiation increase

09:10 AM Apr 12, 2013 -5738- U.S. Experiments: Hundreds of pregnant women fed nuclear material - infants & children fed radioactive lemonade

05:13 PM Mar 28, 2013 -5675- Three Mile Island meltdown 34 years ago today – America’s forgotten nuclear terror – Pregnant women, small children told to leave area (VIDEO & AUDIO)

-8821.1-  Fairewinds Comments on the EPA’s Proposed Changes to the Protective Action Guidelines – Excerpt: T he EPA is suddenly recommending a huge increase to “allowable” public exposure levels from radiation releases caused by a mishap or disaster at an atomic reactor, waste storage site &/or fuel production site.  This means  EPA is arbitrarily choosing to increase human exposure levels to atomic radiation releases ...without conducting an adequate scientific review ...without quantifying significant health consequences to people.

Fairewinds Energy Education’s scientific review finds no evidence or science to allow this health compromising transfer of risk to everyone living in the United States. [This] will compromise public health & safety ...& benefit atomic corporations by allowing significant reductions in each corporation’s mandated cleanup of radiation catastrophes. 

EPA proposes levels of 500 millirem/yr are acceptable in radioactively contaminated water for public consumption ...& an increase to 100 millirem per year of exposure levels to pregnant women and young children. These levels far exceed EPA’s acceptable risk range for cancer-causing radiation exposure. 


02:07 AM Nov 5, 2014 - 8488- West Coast – Baby whales dying since 2011– none survive –mothers pregnant for weeks, then abort; starving – skeletons with skin (VIDEO)

12:41 PM Dec 10, 2014 -8522- Experts: 100% death rate for baby killer whales along West Coast – Alarm bells ring as no newborns have survived in past 3 years – This is absolutely the worst thing possible, pregnant orca dies with decomposing stillborn full-term fetus inside – we’re going to lose them… they’ll be extinct for sure (VIDEO)

 

Crystal Ball in Hearts

 You Can't Save The World Unless You Know W ho's Destroying Her 

Misha, a victim of Chernobyl, at the No 1 orphanage in Minsk – (story, here) photo: Eugene Kolzov 

 

"Until about two billion years ago, it was impossible to have any life on Earth; that is, there was so much radiation on Earth you couldn’t have any life – fish or anything. Gradually, about two billion years ago, the amount of radiation on this planet – and probably in the entire system – reduced and made it possible for some form of life to begin …Now, when we go back to using nuclear power, we are creating something which nature tried to destroy to make life possible …Every time you produce radiation, you produce something that has a certain half-life, in some cases for billions of years. I think the human race is going to wreck itself;  it is important that we get control of this horrible force and try to eliminate it. I do not believe nuclear power is worth it" Admiral Hyman G. Rickover, American naval officer and engineer – the 'father' of America's nuclear Navy. [On the hazards of nuclear power. Testimony to Congress (28 January 1982); published in Economics of Defense Policy: Hearing before the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, 97th Cong., 2nd sess., Pt. 1 (1982) 

Radiation and Pregnancy






 

Are You a Woman Living Within 25 Miles of a Reactor? 

"While nuclear regulators only take fatal cancers into consideration as 'detriments', others, especially those who endure a non-fatal cancer, may find their suffering equally worthy of consideration. And, limiting [the counting of] genetic effects to live born offspring does not wipe away the tears of a family that has endured a spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth."Sister Rosalie Bertell , PhD, GNSH, Pres., International Institute of Concern for Public Health; Editor, International Perspectives in Public Health

Female mammals (including human) living within 25 miles of a nuclear reactor get more cancer than male mammals (including human)


--------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANE      --------

    Paci fic Nuc lea     Newswire for Women   

Do You Live Within 25 Miles of a Reactor? 

...Click the button below, follow the link, enter your zip code, and pray

REACTOR FINDER (CLICK HERe)


Women, pregnant women, girls & infants living within 25 miles of a nuclear reactor get more cancer than men & boys, or those living farther away.
This alone is enough to shut down every nuclear reactor and shut down the Fed for doing it to us.


World Nuclear Association Reports Millions of People Live Within 10 miles (16 km) of an Operating Reactor

The U.S. has 100 commercial power plants, Canada has 19 power stations ...millions of people live within 10 miles (16 km) of an operating reactor

World Nuclear Association reports as of March 2013, 435 commercial nuclear power reactors in 31 countries with 480 more under construction or planned. The U.S. has 100 commercial power plants, and Canada has 19 power stations meaning millions of people live within 10 miles (16 km) of an operating reactor. WNA reports there are 240 research reactors (54 in the U.S.) mainly on university campuses, (such as Reed College, in Woodstock, Portland OR ... where the nuclear rods were leaking for quite a while before being eventually reported or replaced). There are also nuclear dumps, nuclear transportation corridors, nuclear aircraft carriers and submarines, accidents, catastrophes and breakdowns from deferred maintenance and nuclear reactor negligence. The overall death toll from nuclear industry, for all associated activites, is two billion otherwise unaccounted-for deaths. Real, accurate and up-to-date exposure rates in U.S. cities by reactors and fallout, here


Women especially pregnant women within 20-25 miles, girls, infants and unborn get more cancer than men, boys or those farther away: documentation, here –> cell phone   pdf - or - MS W ordw/pop-ups & 'find/search'  

Nightmare: Chernobyl Survivors whose mothers were exposed to fallout resulted in unhealthy pregnancies and children: (l) tormented mentally ill child; (m) Toddler with internal organs located externally; (r) Child with no lymph glands cannot fight off disease. High-yield nuclear fallout destroys ova, sperm, embryo and fetus but so do low-yield emissions from everyday normal reactors that fall on your food, on pastures, on farmland, in your water add up to create genetic mutations or extinctive damage to your health like immune deficiency response, leading to hundreds of diseases culminating in a variety of organ cancers.

(click pic)

(above) When Chernobyl blew up, it was primarily women & pregnant women in the next country over, Belarus, whose ovum & embryos were bathed in high yield nuclear reactor fallout ...but, women do not know that everyday business-as-usual low level fallout from 'normal' nuclear reactors adds up to create similar damage to soft & rapidly growing living tissue & chromosomes that becomes your baby ... it's high time to dismantle the Fed interest rate bankers & their military industrial nuclear reactor/ nuclear bomb industry


 To Read News Articles About Women Today Being Destroyed By Nuclear Industry—Click Here—




Feature Story

Suffering Caused Women by the Nuclear Industry - Nuclear Industry Mutates & Destroys Pregnancies

 Women suffer miscarriage, abortion, stillbirth, deformed, handicapped & retarded kids, immune deficiencies, breast-, uterine- & thyroid cancers – here's the evidence & authority you need to win-over a friend or jury

Nuclear Industry cancer jumps from 1 million to 2 billion; include animals & double or triple that. Cancer rates edge from 1-in-2, to 1-in-1. Will you fight for justice? Deaths from high yield atmospheric testing when low yield is included jump from 1 million to 60 million deaths & 100 million cancers. When all nuclear industry deaths, fatal & non-fatal cancers are included, jump is to 1.2-to-2.4 billion victims. If you include animals, the toll doubles or triples. Since fallout radiation is accumulative in the body, and women carry all their eggs from birth, the chances of ingested everyday fallout harming your unborn child increase as your injestion of each radionuclude atom, increases. 


FOR PREGNANT WOMEN, WOMEN & GIRLS      

True number of nuclear industry victims

by Sister Rosalie Bertell

Statistics are people with tears wiped away 

Epidemiologist counts 1.2 billion fatal & non-fatal nuclear cancer victims: real victims of nuclear industry go untold as a Chernobyl count and as a world count.

Despite the authorities attempt at concealment, we can still begin to enumerate the real victims of the nuclear age –  Although the calculations and statistics which I have brought to bear below do not include all of the human suffering that has been caused by the nuclear age, a closer look will show that the methodology is adequate for a first estimate of major damage. The magnitude of the harm already caused is startling, and even more so when we realise many types of damage have been omitted from this first estimate. In my estimate, cancer, whether fatal or non-fatal (excluding non-fatal skin cancer), genetic damage and serious congenital malformations and diseases ... will be included in the figures. Other damage is acknowledged but not estimated. Ultimately, whether or not one cares about the damage caused by radiation exposure is ultimately a human, not a scientific question.


Whether or not one cares about damage caused by radiation exposure ...is ultimately a human, not a scientific question


An unwanted attack on someone's person or reproductive capacity is a violation of human rights —  Damage is damage, and causing an unwanted attack on someone's person or reproductive capacity is a violation of human rights. Such damage can be rated for importance, but it should not be arbitrarily ignored. "Statistics are the people with the tears wiped away," stated one of the Rongelap people of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, who 'hosted' the United States Bikini nuclear testing in the 1950s.


Hard-hearted mindset that laid down the degree of suffering & ill-health as the 'acceptable' price to pay for the world 'benefitting' from nuclear technology


Story of many tears — This is the story of many tears, and of a hard-hearted mindset that laid down the degree of suffering and ill-health that would be the 'acceptable' price to pay for the world 'benefitting' from nuclear technology.

Risk estimates used in this analysis —  In order to estimate the real victims of the nuclear industry [as oppossed to those figures enumerated by the ICRP, IAEA and other nuclear apologists], I will take the customary risk estimates, indicate their probable range of error, and then extend the definition to cover related events not recognized as 'detriments' by the nuclear regulators. For example, while the nuclear regulators only take fatal cancers into consideration as 'detriments', others, especially those who endure a non-fatal cancer, may find their suffering equally worthy of consideration. And, limiting genetic effects to live born offspring does not wipe away the tears of a family that has endured a spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth.


Nuclear regulators only take fatal cancers into consideration as 'detriments', others, especially those who endure a non-fatal cancer, may find their suffering equally worthy of consideration. And, limiting genetic effects to live born offspring does not wipe away the tears of a family that has endured a spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth


Estimating fatal & non-fatal cancer risks —  In 1991, ICRP concluded the projected lifetime risk of fatal cancer for members of the population exposed to Sievert whole-body radiation at a low dose rate, was between seven and 11 excess fatal cancers ...and, seven to eight excess fatalities for those in the nuclear industry aged 25 to 64 years. We extend these estimates to non-fatal cancers by estimating the total number of cancers which were used by the ICRP in order to obtain the number of fatalities. We, therefore, estimate 16 fatal and non-fatal cancers if we exclude non-fatal skin cancers, or 36 if we count them. If the estimate of fatal cancers was off by a factor of two then we can double all those numbers. The estimate I use for cancer is 16 per 100 Person Sieverts ...but, the reader can adjust this estimate to suit other inclusions, exclusions or uncertainties.


A dose of 150 mSv to human male testes causes temporary sterility, a single dose of 3.5 Sv causes permanent sterility


Estimating damage to an embryo or fetus —  According to the BEIR Committee [Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation] 1990 report, a dose of 150 mSv to human male testes will cause temporary sterility, and a single dose of 3.5 Sv will cause permanent sterility. According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes will cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.


650 mSv is considered to be the threshold for temporary sterility in women – since radionuclides can be retained in bone or fatty tissues, they are able to cross the placenta barrier and disrupt the developing embryo or fetus – radionuclides in the mother's body are transferred in her breast milk


Women carry with them all of the ova from birth which they will ever have —  Women carry with them all of the ova from birth which they will ever have. The threshold for permanent female sterilization decreases with age, but in general about 650 mSv is considered to be the threshold for temporary sterility in women. After the Bravo event -- the detonation of a hydrogen bomb at the Bikini Atoll in the Pacific in March 1954 -- the women of Rongelap Atoll experienced about five years of sterility. As they regained their fertility, they experienced faulty pregnancies, miscarrigies, stillbirths and damage to their offspringSince some radionuclides can be retained in bone or fatty tissues, they are able to cross the placenta barrier and disrupt the developing embryo or fetus. Radionuclides in the mother's body can also be transferred in her breast milk. The official nuclear industry definition of 'detriment' includes only serious genetic disease. Teratogenic diseases (those not passed on to offspring) are not judged by the nuclear industy to be serious, and, therefore, not counted as a 'detriment'.


Women regained their fertility but experienced faulty pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth & offspring


Recently, the 1990 BEIR committee made one small concession in recognizing mental retardation — in children exposed to radiation during the fifth to 15th weeks of their mother's pregnancy —  Radiation kills brain cells, causing both an underdeveloped brain (microcephaly) and mental retardation. For the individual child, BEIR estimates that a dose in utero of 100 to 500 mSv can cause a range of problems from poor school performance to severe mental retardation .


A dose in utero of 100 to 500 mSv can cause problems from poor school performance to severe mental retardation


The 1986 nuclear accident at Chernobyl stunned the world, releasing thousands of tons of radioactivity over an innocent population. Magnum photographer Paul Fusco revisits the affected region, searching for the accident's enduring effects. See the project at http://mediastorm.com/publication/chernobyl-legacy

(To view this video, go to the above link, or on this site: here)

[Editor's save; https://mediastorm.com/publication/chernobyl-legacy

Genetic damage —  The U.N. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation [UNSCEAR] and BEIR both agree that a population of one million live births exposed to 100 Person Sieverts will result in one to three genetic damage effects to offspring and so to the human gene pool. The doubling dose for genetic effects [the dose that will cause twice as many genetic effects] is more contentious, with some geneticists claiming that it is 2.5 Sv, and others claiming much greater sensitivity with a 0.12 Sv doubling dose. If the latter is true, then the increase in genetic effects will be 8.3 per cent for every 10mSv and therefore 83 such effects per million live births when the total averaged dose is 100 Person Sieverts rather than the 4 such effects in the first instanceOn the conservative side, we have taken 10 genetic effects to be the number for exposed offspring .

Estimate of 'Teratogenic Effects' — Damage to an embryo from ionizing radiation when in the womb is not considered to be genetic. Such irradiation can lead to 30 different congenital anomolies, including permanent damage to the brain, mental deficiency, skull deformities, cleft palate, spina bifida, club-feet, genital deformities, growth retardation and childhood cancer. A total of all those effects, including mortality, amount to 46, of which 25 are live born. When we summarise those risk estimates, we get 16 cancers, 10 genetic effects and 25 congenital effects for one million exposed to 100 Person Sieverts.


Damage to an embryo from ionizing radiation when in the womb is not considered to be genetic. Such irradiation can lead to some 30 different congenital anomolies; including: permanent brain damage, mental deficiency, skull deformity, cleft palate, spina bifida, club-feet, genital deformity, growth retardation & childhood cancer


The task now is to apply those numbers for the global population from industrial nuclear activities, including weapons testing in the fifties, sixties and early seventies and electricity production from nuclear power over the past half century. When we do this we find that weapons testing has lead to nearly 376 million cancers, 235 million genetic effects and 587 million teratogenic effects to give a total of approximately 1,200 million. Meanwhile, electricity production from nuclear plants between 1943 and 2000 may have lead to another million victims, of which as many one-fifth will have been premature cancer deaths.


Although not officially accounted for, about 500 million fetuses would have also been lost as stillbirths during that period from radiation exposure while in the womb


"Another century of nuclear power, and this carnage would continue with more than 10 million victims a year. An industry which has the potential to kill, injure and maim that number of innocent people – and all in the name of 'benefitting' society – is surely, wholly unacceptable." 

– Sister Rosalie Bertell, PhD, GNSH, is President of the International Institute of Concern for Public Health, and Editor in Chief of International Perspectives in Public Health (IICPH).

"In order to estimate the real victims of the nuclear industry (as oppossed to those figures enumerated by the ICRP, IAEA and other nuclear apologists), I will take the customary risk estimates, indicate their probable range of error, and then extend the definition to cover related events not recognized as 'detriments' by nuclear regulators.

"While nuclear regulators only take fatal cancers into consideration as 'detriments', others, especially those who endure a non-fatal cancer, may find their suffering equally worthy of consideration.

"And, limiting genetic effects to live born offspring does not wipe away the tears of a family that has endured a spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth."

– Sister Rosalie Bertell, PhD, GNSH, is President of the International Institute of Concern for Public Health, and Editor in Chief of International Perspectives in Public Health (IICPH)

(Editor's note – Following is Rosalie's figures on nuclear lethal & non-lethal cancer causes:)

 Rosalie's Figures on Nuclear Lethal & Non-lethal Cancer Causes

(Exciting conclusion of Sister Rosalie's story, with letter of explanation, (follows below) – including the truth and true figures of Chernobyl casualties ...thousands of times higher than numbers falsified by nuclear industry regulatory apologists.)


Sister Rosalie Bertell

Following article from The Ecologist, Nov 1999, pp. 408-411

Victims Of The Nuclear Age

By Dr. Rosalie Bertell

Abstract: A minimum of 1,200 million people have been killed, maimed or diseased by nuclear power since it's inception. The industry's figures massively underestimate the real cost of nuclear power with restrictive rules, in an attempt to hide its victims from the world. Here, the author calculates the real number of victims of the nuclear age. Additionally, Rosalie cites figures on the true amount of deaths and casualties from Chernobyl ...thousands of times higher than nuclear industry regulatory apologists claim.


Firemen Deployed as Bio-Robots to Clean up Chernobyl

On the tenth anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster, I was standing at a public meeting in Kiev, Ukraine, listening to the story of one of the firemen employed to clean up the site after the explosion. These workers took huge doses of radiation during this task, and their story is a terrifying one.

Human Bio-robots

About 600,000 men were conscripted as Chernobyl `liquidators' [also called bio-robots']: farmers, factory workers, miners, and soldiers -- as well as professionals like the firemen -- from all across Russia. Some of these men lifted pieces of radioactive metal with their bare hands. They had to fight more than 300 fires created by the chunks of burning material spewed off by the inferno. They buried trucks, fire engines, cars and all sorts of personal belongings. They felled a forest and completely buried it, removed topsoil, bulldozed houses and filled all available clay-lined trenches with radioactive debris. The minimum conscription time was 180 days, but many stayed for a year. Some were threatened with severe punishment to their families if they failed to stay and do their duty. These `liquidators' are now discarded and forgotten, many vainly trying to establish that the ill health most have suffered ever since 1986 is a result of their massive exposure to radiation.

'Living dead'

At the Centre for Radiation Research outside Kiev, there is an organization of former liquidators. This group reports that by 1995, 13,000 of their members had died ... almost 20 percent of which deaths were suicides. About 70,000 members were estimated to be permanently disabled. But the members of this organization are the lucky ones. Because many former liquidators are now scattered throughout Russia, they neither have the benefit of the organization's special hospital, nor of membership of a survivor organization. They are known as the `living dead.'

The fireman whose story I was listening to seemed to be an exception to this grim litany of illness and death. He was telling the meeting how pleased and excited he was that, for the first time in ten years, his blood test findings were in the normal range. I was standing next to a delegate from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) – the organisation charged with promoting the use of atomic energy.

On hearing the fireman's story, he leaned over to me and said: "You see! We said these were only transient disorders."

A rough translation might read: Chernobyl? What's the problem? 

NRC, ICRP & IAEA Continue Ignoring the Victims of Nuclear Industry

The IAEA man's attitude was perfectly in keeping with that of his organization which, along with the International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) exists in practice largely to play down the effects of radiation on human health, and to shield the nuclear industry from compensation claims from the public. The IAEA was set up in the late 1950s by he UN, to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and to promote the peaceful use of atomic energy – ironically, two contradictory objectives.

1928 International Committee on X-Ray and Radium Protection

The ICRP evolved from the 1928 International Committee on X-Ray and Radium Protection, and was set up in the fifties to explore the health effects of radiation and [theoretically] to protect the public from it. In fact, both organizations have come to serve the industry rather than the public.

The Chernobyl case is a classic example of the IAEA's inadequacy and questionable science. Despite massive evidence to the contrary, not least from the many thousands of victims themselves, the IAEA insists that only 32 people have so far died as a result of Chernobyl – those who died in the radiation ward of Hospital six in Moscow.

All other deaths related to the disaster and its aftermath are ignored; (and, there have been many more than 10,000 in Ukraine, alone ...according to the Minister of Health there). Belarus had the highest fallout, and yet there is an international blackout among the IAEA and the rest of the 'radiation protection community' on the suffering of its people.

The essential problem is that both the IAEA and the ICRP are dealing not with science but with politics and administration; not with public health but with maintaining an increasingly dubious industry. It is their interests, and those of the nuclear industry, to play down the health effects of radiation. 

Restrictive Definitions

The main way in which the "radiation protection industry" has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic.

For example, under IAEA's criteria: 

> If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in IAEA figures. 

> If a cancer is initiated by another carcinogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted. 

> If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted. 

> Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count.

> A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child's offspring. 

> Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a 'serious genetic disease' (in the Mendelian sense). 

> Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays]. 

> Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes ...in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed. 

> If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached.

It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.  [continued, here]

 
from Rosalie Bertell to Zac Goldsmith, editor, The Ecologist
03/11/99 2:58 PM re November Issue

Dear Zac,
Congratulations on a generally excellent issue! I have always felt that newspaper articles are too fleeting, and books are too ponderous to reach the public on this important issue; however, you have found a very good imtermediate carrier for the information. Please keep me informed of reactions (which may get nasty).

I was concerned about my article, and perhaps there were some attempts to reach me for comments when I was overseas (13 Oct to 2 Nov). It was too bad that important references were omitted, as was the fact that I used only UNSCEAR data on population doses of radiation due to weapons or civilian nuclear enterprises. The text does not mention the source of the population dose estimates, which are fundamental to the credibility. I can also be faulted for the comment (added by someone) that 100 mSv is the equivalent in radiation to about 100 medical Xrays. Nuclear doses are always whole body doses, while medical Xray delivers a partial body dose to the target organ (teeth, chest, kidney, etc.). Speaking about "100 medical Xrays" is pretty vague and useless.

I tried to present the results in table form so that you could aggregate them as you needed, but I cannot match the numbers used in the article with my original estimates. The editor exaggerated somewhat the weapon testing contribution and very much slighted the nuclear power contribution. Both calculations were made using the same methodology and both used the official UNSCEAR data.

However, the text says: "we find that weapon testing has led to ....... approximately 1,200 million. Meanwhile, electricity production from nuclear plants between 1943 and 2000 may have led to another million victims ....."My estimates are:

Nuclear weapon testing:  1,138 million
 
Nuclear weapon production:  3.2 million
  (84% local or regional)

Nuclear power production:  21 million
  (76% local or regional)

Medical production and use:  4 million 
 
Accidents:  Military,  16 million
 
Civilian,  15 million 
 
Total Military:  1,156 million
 
Total civilian electricity related:  36 million
 
Total medical:  4 million
 
GRAND TOTAL:
1,200 million


Of these amounts, about 31.4% are radiation induced cancers; 19.6% are genetic effects and 49% are teratogenetic effects in live born offspring.I used official risk factors except for not introducing the dose rate effect which the nuclear people do to reduce the number of cancers. My own research would say that the cancer estimates should be doubled, not divided by two. In the paper I maintained a neutral position be not doing either.

Best wishes, 
Rosalie Bertell

about:  Sister Rosalie Bertell




--------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANE      --------

  Pa cifi c Nucle ar    Newswire for Women 

Women & pregnant women, babies-to-be, infants & girls within 25 miles of a nuclear reactor get more cancer than men or boys or those living farther away

“A 2012 study of all nuclear plants in France found elevated levels of child leukemia in the vicinity of the plants. A 2008 study in Germany came to a similar conclusion regarding child leukemia and Germany’s nuclear generating facilities. A study in, Archives of Environmental Health, in 2003 found cancer rates in children were 12.4 percent higher (than nationwide occurrences) in 49 counties surrounding 14 nuclear plants in the eastern United States.” - Excerpted from, Washington Spectator, (project of Public Concern Foundation), Watching the Nuclear Watchdog, February 1, 2015, by Janet Sherman.

Editor's note: Following numbered items (-0000-) excerpted from our free book: Nuclear Power is Not Safe & Clean. It has 9,000 numbered newswire summaries, linked to 1-to-5 pieces of original documentation supporting each headline, overall 25,000 linked pieces of documentation. PDF cell phone version or MS Word (with find/search box.)

June 2011: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) today admitted there is no such thing as ‘safe’ levels of radiation - allowable radiation standard based on ‘benefit’, not safety. Not just cancer: How low doses of radiation can cause heart disease and stroke.

-3163- Slower you spread radiation dose, more effectively it produces cancer & inherited defects - 04/25/12

-3162- Mother speaks about brain cancers around San Onofre nuclear plant - 04/25/12


Normal nuclear reactors spew fallout every day same as nuclear bombs


Sustained low levels of everyday nuclear emission-fallout add up in you – can be more harmful than a nuclear bomb

Every day, low yield nuclear reactor fallout from cancer-causing releases from 'normal' reactors, mishaps, facility-obsolescence leaks, nuclear dump leakage and mishaps, uranium mining, tailing operations, shipping nuclear materials and waste by plane, ship, train, truck and container mishaps …produces the same fallout that detonating a nuclear bomb produces – and is considered by the nuclear industry as 'business-as-usual'. The (pink pregnant woman) chart link tells how normal reactors contaminate our food, water, earth, sky ...and you. <>

09:10 AM Apr 12, 2013 | 80 -5738- U.S. Experiments: Hundreds of pregnant women fed nuclear material - infants & children fed radioactive lemonade, here

Women especially pregnant women within 20-25 miles, girls, infants and unborn get more cancer than men, boys or those farther away: documentation, here —>  cell phone   pdf - or -  MS Word with 'find/search'



How are the Fed interest-rate families killing pregnant women, pregnant animals & kids where you live?

SE Portland, OR: Farm closes – soil full of Fukushima nuclear fallout here

Soil contaminated forever from airborne Fukushima fallout; City emergency preparedness dept. denial; & denies millions of dead sea animals covering OR coast from seaborne fallout: "Ban on inland fishing due to new & mysterious diseases from global warming"... & collapse of fishing industry & dying sea mammals with bleeding lesions & tumors, City says, "from global warming" -More local Fukushima fallout news, here (Webmaster's note: City neglects to say global warming is from nuclear fallout, military, aerial aerosols, weather warfaredirected energy weapons making fires, earthquakes, tsunamis & monster storms never before in history.)

After Japan, most radioactive area is Cascade Mountains – Portland has cesium at 100 Bq/m² (VIDEO) here

Expert on U.S., Canada: We’ll see a statistically meaningful increase in cancer from Fukushima on west coast More local Fukushima fallout info, here

Radiation airborne Fukushima nuclear fallout precautions: Seattle, Vancouver, Portland? “Perhaps you need to wash your shoes”… and other things (VIDEO here

How are the Fed interest-rate families killing pregnant women, pregnant animals & kids where you live?

Article of the Week

Cooling Towers

G erman Study: Children living by nuclear plants - double leukemia rates here

More cancer - Reactors cannot prevent tritium radiation escape (VIDEO) - Continued, here


C hild leukemia doubles near French nuclear plants here
 

Result is statistically significant -IRSN expert - Continued, here

E vidence links reactors & ill health in UK here

“Clear something is going” says prof. — UK gov’t blames unidentified virus for childhood leukemia rise  Continued, here

Woman with Headache

U .S. Study: 23% higher incidence of child leukemia within 16 km of nuclear facilities here

Epidemiologic studies of spatial variation in cancer incidence or mortality have been conducted to investigate effects of unplanned releases as well as routine operations.  Continued, here

Hanford WA area – Children born without brains – highest U.S. rate –former reactor site, leaking & exploding nuclear dump here


Women & pregnant women, babies-to-be, infants & girls within 25 miles of a nuclear reactor get more cancer than men, boys or those living farther away here

World Nuclear Association reports millions of people live within 10 miles (16 km) of an operating reactor, here. Each one releases deadly tritium into the air, every day that falls on you and on your food and water and adds up inside to hurt you; (tritium, here)

What's happening in your State where you live? (here)

A personalized nuclear weather forecast for your City,  (watch the first 3 youtubes)  here.

Millions (billions) of animals dying in the Pacific Ocean, on shore, on land & birds & eagles falling from the sky, (here).

Is a lifeless planet on your radar? here

Entergy Does Manhattan (here: cell phone pdf -&/or- computer: msword w/search engine)

Hillary Does Japan here

Fukushima Does Portland here: cell phone pdf -&/or- computer: msword w/search engine

The Life Force in Portland, Oregon here: cell phone pdf


| Children Suffer Nuclear Impact Worldwide | Extreme Nuclear Dangers | Tritium Expose | Smokescreen | Hottest Hot Particle | Hot Particles in Seattle & Boston | Nuclear Power Makes Global Warming Worse | Sabotage: Trump Obama EPA Guts Nuclear Protective Action Guidelines |


Fukushima Caused An Additional 50,000 otherwise Unaccounted-for USA Newborn Deaths

Fukushima Caused An Additional 50,000 otherwise Unaccounted-for USA Newborn Deaths

Click pic for link


Walking Dead Zombies

This could be you ...it's just a matter of Time

This could be you within the matter of minutes, months or years due to manmade background ionizing radiation exposure that keeps growing & growing more & more! ...exposure to nuclear reactors ...& exposure from nuclear dumps, mines, submarines & aircraft carries, tests & catastrophes

Nuclear industry mutates your eyes & destroys your hearts & organs ...ask parents of these kids what to do with pro-nukers —(pictures, here)—

These kids were in their mother's wombs when Chernobyl melted down and blew up, permanently contaminating Ukraine, Belarus, Europe and Eastern Europe...and shreding their reproductive DNA so that as embryos radiouclides prevented them from reproducing faithfully after their own kind ...and their bodies were mutated by nuclear industry (owned by the banking families that own the Fed) (video, here  & here) for which you are paying the nuclear industry bill with the blood of your children. Nuclear industry blasphemes Divine Order.

A matter of Time

Nuclear industry is destroying all life on Earth ... it's just a matter of Time ...for the Fed's false gods of money, financial slavery, sex slavery, child labor and trafficking in weapons, body organs, oil, uranium and war. Fed interest rate banking family dynasties that own nuclear industry should be arrested, divested, tried, judged, sentenced and marched to the gallows, and the Federal Reserve System of crime, genocide, ecocide and war against humanity, dissolved.

They Are Destroying Generations of Your Children

Deformed children in Fallujah – from depleted uranium munitions —(More, here)—

Making America great again

Young women in Fallujah in Iraq are terrified of having children because of the increasing number of babies born grotesquely deformed, with no heads, two heads, a single eye in their foreheads, scaly bodies or missing limbs. In addition, young children in Fallujah are now experiencing hideous cancers and leukemia. These deformities are now well documented, for example in television documentaries on SKY UK on September 1, 2009, and on SKY UK June 2008. One grave digger of a single cemetery is burying four to five babies a day, most of which he says are deformed. (cont)

My first trip to Chernobyl

{see footnote at 3624.1} Hope Burwell writes: On my first trip to Chernobyl in November 2000, I spent three days touring schools in Cherikov and the even more contaminated areas of the Mogilev district. Then we traveled to children’s hospitals in Minsk. What I saw there still shows up in nightmares: children with eyes in the sides of their heads, and children with no eyes at all, children with fingers that look like toes and children whose genitals are so poorly formed one can’t determine their sex. Those nightmares are audible with infant wails like the cries of wounded wild animals.


TV: Surge in babies being born with extra arms, legs after Fukushima – “I feel officials know the cause is radiation” – Nurse says many are getting abortions to avoid ‘inconvenient’ babies – “High number of stillbirths” – Many people reporting cancers, even far away from Fukushima —(more)—

BY ENENEWS, ON APRIL 18TH, 2016


LaborNet TV (subtitles by Emiko Suehiro), Feb 24, 2016

–Setsuko Kida, evacuee from Tomiokamachi: My daughter [got] pregnant in the fall of 2013, but she was diagnosed with tethered miscarriage… the womb grew… but her unborn baby didn’t grow at all. ... ... ...  A year later I got to hear first hand cases of babies with a structural birth defect or polymelia ["Birth defect… in which the affected individual has more than the usual number of limbs"], twice as many  ...more than 10 girls had similar experience as my daughter’s. Actually one woman was recommended to get an abortion at 6 months pregnancy last summer, and her unborn baby lacking one arm, one leg, with only three fingers ... —(continued, here)—


Your family is now an endangered species

REACTOR FINDER (CLICK HERE)

To avoid cancer from the reactors, read the e-books

I'm too stupid to think that interlocking directorships, I mean dictatorships, of the western central banks should be held responsible for giving us cancer ...aren't I? Aren't you? After all, they gave us Santa Claws.

Nuclear industry is a crime against the unborn

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANE      ---------- 

  Paci fi c Nuc le ar    Newswire for Women 

Reactor Finder Surprise!

Every second each nuclear reactor chimney releases tritium & more radionuclides onto women & girls ...& into their ova, fetus & unborn child ... it can't be stopped

Tritium is gas, solid & liquid. The tritium hydrogen atom is a radionuclide. It replaces the hydrogen atom in water (H20) on contact. Therefore, you can not remove tritium from water, because it is the water. As a gas it touches your skin and penetrates into your water (you are 60%-70% water). (Tritium expose here)

Ever wish they told you the truth?

As a solid upon contact with your skin, vegetable garden, flowers, trees, crops or pets it is absorbed into the moisture. As liquid like in rain, rivers, fog, bottled water or in the shower, you absorb it. The short wave length of tritium is the same as the width of DNA, so it destroys your DNA and mutates it, creating birth defects and cancer. Tritium accumulates in your body & destroys your ova & fetus. continued here

Diagram of Woman

Click pic for full story

And, while you're at it, here's another one just in case you don't get it:

here!

Nuclear industry is a crime against girls & babies

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANE      ---------- 

  Paci fi c Nuc le ar    Newswire for Women 

Women, Girls & Babies by Nuclear Reactors Get More Cancer

Women, pregnant women, babies-to-be, infants & girls within 25 miles of a nuclear reactor get more cancer than men or boys or those living farther away 

More      Evidence     Exhibits cell phone pdf  MS Word

Why are women not told? ...nuclear power is not safe & clean

...the infant mortality rate doubled in Seattle and British Columbia from fallout ...an organic farm in Southeast Portland shut down because its soil was too full of Fukushima fallout to grow vegetables and fruit for market ...there are 20,000 otherwise accounted for deaths in the U.S. since March 2011, (first fallout from three meltdowns from Fukushima Japan continuing unchecked, today and forever). Fallout never goes away, it accumulates, adding up ...it keeps killing practically, forever. more

World Nuclear Association

WNA reports millions of people live within 10 miles (16 km) of an operating reactor, moreThe overall toll from nuclear industry, for all associated activities, is 1,200 million (1.2 billion) otherwise unaccounted-for deaths. (See featured story.) Real, accurate and up-to-date exposure rates in U.S. cities by reactors, here. 

The reason we are not told is because the nuclear industry is getting away with murder. Until you read these books

Map

(t) L.A. pediactric cancer map; (m) Sites currently affected by historical nuclear testing; (b) Location of reactors where women & girls within 25 miles have higher cancer rates than men or boys, or those living farther away (each reactor site is also a nuclear dump).

Will these kids make it? ...not the ones in the picture on top, but the ones in the nuclear testing red zones that go up into Canada where it's not important to warn them on the map ...cause they have free health care anyway, and we have to die because we can't afford our medicine. I like capitalism. It's like genocide in a bottle ...and, it's on sale.

Thumbnail of St. Louis County Map

(above pic) What about these kids in St. Louis County, Missouri? ...their parents? ...friends? ...pets? ...teachers? ...rabbis & priests & pastors? Do you think nuclear industry gives a shit if they live or die? ...or cares if nuclear gives you & your pets cancer & murders you? ...don't be an idiot.  story, here

Nuclear industry is a crime against kids & the animal kingdom

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANE      ---------- 

  Paci fi c Nuc le ar    Newswire for Women 

California kids map pediatric cancers

Physicians for Social Responsibility - Los Angeles

PSR-LA directs nuclear threats program advocating protective health policies for nuclear industry weapons, nuclear energy & radiation regulations & ensures a proper cleanup of Santa Susana Field Lab, former nuclear & rocket testing facility polluted with nuclear industry radionuclides & chemical contamination. 

nuclear hotseat       ADD'l

Clan of One-Breasted Women  more

[Editor's note: (below) Additional interactive map indexed by State &/or zip code that lists other U.S. nuclear industry research & development sites; interactive map & legend of color codes  here]

Nuclear Industry Research and Development Sites


Staggering number of cancers, illnesses, & birth defects linked to nuclear waste

700 cases in four square miles in St. Louis County, Missouri – cancer & cojoined twin rates statistically impossible (story,  here )

St. Louis County Map

(above) What about these kids in St. Louis County, Missouri? ...their parents? ...friends? ...dogs & cats? ...teachers? ...rabbis, priests & pastors? Do you think nuclear industry really gives a shit if they live or die? ...or if nuclear murders you & your pets? ...don't be an idiot. Round up nuclear, take 'em to court, try them, sentence them & march them to the gallows & spit on their graves before they kill you, first.

News Panel

Familly

(click pic)

Gee, once my kids are dead, does that mean I don't have to support them anymore?

Nuclear industry is a crime against youth

Fairewinds video interviews & transcripts

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANE      ---------- 

  Paci fi c Nuc le ar    Newswire for Women 

Children Suffer Nuclear Impact Worldwide

Contrary to cartoon superheroes: Kids don't get superpowers from routine-everyday nuclear industry reactor fallout, waste & accidents – instead: immune deficiency diseases & cancer

Maggie Gundersen, Chiho Kaneko & Caroline Phillips of Fairewinds.org interviewed by Margaret Harrington of CCTV Channel 17 in Burlington, Vermont, June 20, 2016: (here).  Original transcript by Fairewinds; scroll down, (here).  Formatted & edited oral history transcript by Nuclear Weather Forecast, ( PDF, here) - or - (with MS Word search engine, footnotes, endnotes, charts & supplementary information, here)


| Children Suffer Nuclear Impact Worldwide | Extreme Nuclear Dangers | Tritium Expose | Smokescreen | Hottest Hot Particle | Hot Particles in Seattle & Boston | Nuclear Power Makes Global Warming Worse | EPA Sabotage: Wrecks Protective Action Guidelines |


 

Explosion

location, (click pic) 

This is in Beatty, Nevada ... let's see; there are 30 million one-ton rotting plastic bags full of nuclear waste in Japan ... guess we better burn it or toss it into the Pacific because that's what evil monsters do that want to destroy all life with DNA on Earth.

Lung cancers to start increasing in Pacific Northwest

Nov 16, 2014 | U.S. Nuclear Professor: Fukushima “a really major event here”, Washington had radioactive aerosols 100,000 times normal; “Far more bigger accident than we’re hearing” — Model shows West Coast completely blacked out due to particles covering area — Gundersen: Lung cancers to start increasing in Pacific Northwest (AUDIO) here

Nuclear industry is a crime against youth 

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANE      ---------- 

  Paci fi c Nuc le ar    Newswire for Women 

Nuclear Power is Not Safe & Clean

...did you know it's killing you & your kids & Congress & your doctors are lying to you & shortening your life? 

(story continued , here)

Do you really think these people think nuclear is safe & clean?

Mar 2, 2016 | TV: Shocking number of cancers around leaking nuclear plant near NYC … Tens of thousands of cases recently reported … “More than anywhere else in U.S.” … “Why is this story not being covered by everybody?” — Teacher: “I can’t believe the number of teachers who have gotten cancer” (VIDEOS) here

Oct 8, 2015 | UPI: ‘Skyrocketing’ cancer cases in Fukushima — AP: ‘Alarming’ cancer rates after nuclear disaster — Times: Child cancers up 5,000% — Radiation doses may be “considerably higher” than estimated — Expert: Cancer outbreak shows officials must now prepare for onset of leukemia, other diseases (VIDEO) here

Nov 4, 2013 | ABC Radio: “Cancer cases in Fukushima emerging faster than expected” — Japan Surgeon: I’m very angry, it’s very strange officials won’t release basic data (AUDIO)  here

Nov 13, 2013 | More cancers in Fukushima children — Mother: We don’t know what’s actually going on, I can’t trust gov’t — TV: Private hospital finds cysts after ‘official’ tests were all clear (VIDEO) here

Jun 8, 2016 | Spike in number of U.S. sailors dying after Fukushima radiation exposure — Now over 400 veterans suffering serious illnesses — Former Japan Prime Minister breaks down crying, “This can’t be ignored any longer… Number of sick people increasing – symptoms worsening” (VIDEO) here

More: Washington State, here  | Missouri, here  | India, here | Russia, here | Japan, here

 


Nature

When I grow up, I want to destroy the world. I think I'll be a central banker; they're already doing it. Hmmm. They don't teach you that in school ...what a waste of time that was. What do I need life for, anyway? It's a waste of money.

Like it or not...

you are in a dream of  beauty & horror

You are about to enter this dream world of horror and beauty ...as never before. No matter how strong you are, you will never return. You will come back a different person like a werewolf or vampire changing others with your teeth and claws bringing them to eternal knowledge, as you change. 

Nuclear industry is a crime against children

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANE      ---------- 

  Paci fi c Nuc le ar    Newswire for Women 

Join Us On a Roller Coaster Ride to Save the Life Force & be a Dream Warrior

Women are an endangered species – if you won't fight to save beauty, all you'll have left is horror

The Life Force is suffering as never before ...can you feel it? When ionizing radiation mutates DNA, it doesn't care if it is plant, animal or human DNA. It destroys the Life Force and Divine Order of every living creature or plant to faithfully reproduce itself after its own kind. Ionizing radiation creates immune deficiency and hundreds of other diseases leading to terminal and non-terminal cancer. The Life Force needs you, your children, pets, gardens and children-to-be, safe and sound. It needs your love to survive. You need to know the truth they're not telling you. (continued)

Screenshot of News Article

Nuclear industry destroys Divine Order & the ability for women to have normal kids

Say goodbye to your friends and the person you were. You are someone, new ...all your own, a dream warrior. (See feature story, here ...and see, Nuclear Industry destroys Divine Order of a plant, animal or person to faithfully reproduce itself after its own kind, here)

Slideshow

(above) click pic (more info, here)



Finland's nuclear authority may act to halt construction  of the country's new EPR reactor over safety fears - a French study has found a doubling of the incidence of leukemia in children under 5 living near nuclear power plants. (here) & (add'l info here)—