--------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANET       --------

 Pacific Nuclear  Newswire for Women 

Women & pregnant women, babies-to-be, infants & girls within 25 miles of a nuclear reactor get more cancer than men or boys or those living farther away

“A 2012 study of all nuclear plants in France found elevated levels of child leukemia in the vicinity of the plants. A 2008 study in Germany came to a similar conclusion regarding child leukemia and Germany’s nuclear generating facilities. A study in, Archives of Environmental Health, in 2003 found cancer rates in children were 12.4 percent higher (than nationwide occurrences) in 49 counties surrounding 14 nuclear plants in the eastern United States.” - Excerpted from, Washington Spectator, (project of Public Concern Foundation), Watching the Nuclear Watchdog, February 1, 2015, by Janet Sherman.

Editor's note: Following numbered items (-0000-) excerpted from our free book: Nuclear Power is Not Safe & Clean. It has 9,000 numbered newswire summaries, linked to 1-to-5 pieces of original documentation supporting each headline, overall 25,000 linked pieces of documentation. PDF cell phone version or MS Word (with find/search box.)

--------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANET       --------

 Pacific Nuclear  Newswire for Women 

Do You Live Within 25 Miles of a Reactor? 

...Click the button below, follow the link, enter your zip code, and pray

REACTOR FINDER (CLICK HERE

Feature Story

Suffering Caused Women by the Nuclear Industry

 Women suffer miscarriage, abortion, stillbirth, deformed, handicapped & retarded kids, immune deficiencies, breast-, uterine- & thyroid cancers – here's the evidence & authority you need to win-over a friend or jury

Nuclear Industry cancer jumps from 1 million to 2 billion; include animals & double or triple that. Cancer rates edge from 1-in-2, to 1-in-1. Will you fight for justice? Deaths from high yield atmospheric testing when low yield is included jump from 1 million to 60 million deaths & 100 million cancers. When all nuclear industry deaths, fatal & non-fatal cancers are included, jump is to 1.2-to-2.4 billion victims. If you include animals, the toll doubles or triples. Since fallout radiation is accumulative in the body, and women carry all their eggs from birth, the chances of ingested everyday fallout harming your unborn child increase as your injestion of each radionuclude atom, increases. 

FOR PREGNANT WOMEN, WOMEN & GIRLS     

True number of nuclear industry victims

by Sister Rosalie Bertell

Statistics are people with tears wiped away 

Epidemiologist counts 1.2 billion fatal & non-fatal nuclear cancer victims: real victims of nuclear industry go untold as a Chernobyl count and as a world count.

Despite the authorities attempt at concealment, we can still begin to enumerate the real victims of the nuclear age – Although the calculations and statistics which I have brought to bear below do not include all of the human suffering that has been caused by the nuclear age, a closer look will show that the methodology is adequate for a first estimate of major damage. The magnitude of the harm already caused is startling, and even more so when we realise many types of damage have been omitted from this first estimate. In my estimate, cancer, whether fatal or non-fatal (excluding non-fatal skin cancer), genetic damage and serious congenital malformations and diseases ... will be included in the figures. Other damage is acknowledged but not estimated. Ultimately, whether or not one cares about the damage caused by radiation exposure is ultimately a human, not a scientific question.

Whether or not one cares about damage caused by radiation exposure ...is ultimately a human, not a scientific question

An unwanted attack on someone's person or reproductive capacity is a violation of human rights — Damage is damage, and causing an unwanted attack on someone's person or reproductive capacity is a violation of human rights. Such damage can be rated for importance, but it should not be arbitrarily ignored. "Statistics are the people with the tears wiped away," stated one of the Rongelap people of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, who 'hosted' the United States Bikini nuclear testing in the 1950s.

Hard-hearted mindset that laid down the degree of suffering & ill-health as the 'acceptable' price to pay for the world 'benefitting' from nuclear technology

Story of many tears — This is the story of many tears, and of a hard-hearted mindset that laid down the degree of suffering and ill-health that would be the 'acceptable' price to pay for the world 'benefitting' from nuclear technology.

Risk estimates used in this analysis — In order to estimate the real victims of the nuclear industry [as oppossed to those figures enumerated by the ICRP, IAEA and other nuclear apologists], I will take the customary risk estimates, indicate their probable range of error, and then extend the definition to cover related events not recognized as 'detriments' by the nuclear regulators. For example, while the nuclear regulators only take fatal cancers into consideration as 'detriments', others, especially those who endure a non-fatal cancer, may find their suffering equally worthy of consideration. And, limiting genetic effects to live born offspring does not wipe away the tears of a family that has endured a spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth.

Nuclear regulators only take fatal cancers into consideration as 'detriments', others, especially those who endure a non-fatal cancer, may find their suffering equally worthy of consideration. And, limiting genetic effects to live born offspring does not wipe away the tears of a family that has endured a spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth

Estimating fatal & non-fatal cancer risks — In 1991, ICRP concluded the projected lifetime risk of fatal cancer for members of the population exposed to Sievert whole-body radiation at a low dose rate, was between seven and 11 excess fatal cancers ...and, seven to eight excess fatalities for those in the nuclear industry aged 25 to 64 years. We extend these estimates to non-fatal cancers by estimating the total number of cancers which were used by the ICRP in order to obtain the number of fatalities. We, therefore, estimate 16 fatal and non-fatal cancers if we exclude non-fatal skin cancers, or 36 if we count them. If the estimate of fatal cancers was off by a factor of two then we can double all those numbers. The estimate I use for cancer is 16 per 100 Person Sieverts ...but, the reader can adjust this estimate to suit other inclusions, exclusions or uncertainties.

A dose of 150 mSv to human male testes causes temporary sterility, a single dose of 3.5 Sv causes permanent sterility

Estimating damage to an embryo or fetus — According to the BEIR Committee [Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation] 1990 report, a dose of 150 mSv to human male testes will cause temporary sterility, and a single dose of 3.5 Sv will cause permanent sterility. According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes will cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.

650 mSv is considered to be the threshold for temporary sterility in women – since radionuclides can be retained in bone or fatty tissues, they are able to cross the placenta barrier and disrupt the developing embryo or fetus – radionuclides in the mother's body are transferred in her breast milk

Women carry with them all of the ova from birth which they will ever have — Women carry with them all of the ova from birth which they will ever have. The threshold for permanent female sterilization decreases with age, but in general about 650 mSv is considered to be the threshold for temporary sterility in women. After the Bravo event -- the detonation of a hydrogen bomb at the Bikini Atoll in the Pacific in March 1954 -- the women of Rongelap Atoll experienced about five years of sterility. As they regained their fertility, they experienced faulty pregnancies, miscarrigies, stillbirths and damage to their offspring. Since some radionuclides can be retained in bone or fatty tissues, they are able to cross the placenta barrier and disrupt the developing embryo or fetus. Radionuclides in the mother's body can also be transferred in her breast milk. The official nuclear industry definition of 'detriment' includes only serious genetic disease. Teratogenic diseases (those not passed on to offspring) are not judged by the nuclear industy to be serious, and, therefore, not counted as a 'detriment'.

Women regained their fertility but experienced faulty pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth & offspring

Recently, the 1990 BEIR committee made one small concession in recognizing mental retardation — in children exposed to radiation during the fifth to 15th weeks of their mother's pregnancy — Radiation kills brain cells, causing both an underdeveloped brain (microcephaly) and mental retardation. For the individual child, BEIR estimates that a dose in utero of 100 to 500 mSv can cause a range of problems from poor school performance to severe mental retardation.

A dose in utero of 100 to 500 mSv can cause problems from poor school performance to severe mental retardation

The 1986 nuclear accident at Chernobyl stunned the world, releasing thousands of tons of radioactivity over an innocent population. Magnum photographer Paul Fusco revisits the affected region, searching for the accident's enduring effects. See the project at http://mediastorm.com/publication/chernobyl-legacy

[Editor's save; https://mediastorm.com/publication/chernobyl-legacy

Genetic damage — The U.N. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation [UNSCEAR] and BEIR both agree that a population of one million live births exposed to 100 Person Sieverts will result in one to three genetic damage effects to offspring, and so to the human gene pool. The doubling dose for genetic effects [the dose that will cause twice as many genetic effects] is more contentious, with some geneticists claiming that it is 2.5 Sv, and others claiming much greater sensitivity with a 0.12 Sv doubling dose. If the latter is true, then the increase in genetic effects will be 8.3 per cent for every 10mSv and therefore 83 such effects per million live births when the total averaged dose is 100 Person Sieverts rather than the 4 such effects in the first instance. On the conservative side, we have taken 10 genetic effects to be the number for exposed offspring.

Estimate of 'Teratogenic Effects' — Damage to an embryo from ionizing radiation when in the womb is not considered to be genetic. Such irradiation can lead to 30 different congenital anomolies, including permanent damage to the brain, mental deficiency, skull deformities, cleft palate, spina bifida, club-feet, genital deformities, growth retardation and childhood cancer. A total of all those effects, including mortality, amount to 46, of which 25 are live born. When we summarise those risk estimates, we get 16 cancers, 10 genetic effects and 25 congenital effects for one million exposed to 100 Person Sieverts.

Damage to an embryo from ionizing radiation when in the womb is not considered to be genetic. Such irradiation can lead to some 30 different congenital anomolies; including: permanent brain damage, mental deficiency, skull deformity, cleft palate, spina bifida, club-feet, genital deformity, growth retardation & childhood cancer

The task now is to apply those numbers for the global population from industrial nuclear activities, including weapons testing in the fifties, sixties and early seventies and electricity production from nuclear power over the past half century. When we do this we find that weapons testing has lead to nearly 376 million cancers, 235 million genetic effects and 587 million teratogenic effects to give a total of approximately 1,200 million. Meanwhile, electricity production from nuclear plants between 1943 and 2000 may have lead to another million victims, of which as many one-fifth will have been premature cancer deaths.

Although not officially accounted for, about 500 million fetuses would have also been lost as stillbirths during that period from radiation exposure while in the womb

"Another century of nuclear power, and this carnage would continue with more than 10 million victims a year. An industry which has the potential to kill, injure and maim that number of innocent people – and all in the name of 'benefitting' society – is surely, wholly unacceptable." 

– Sister Rosalie Bertell, PhD, GNSH, is President of the International Institute of Concern for Public Health, and Editor in Chief of International Perspectives in Public Health (IICPH).

"In order to estimate the real victims of the nuclear industry (as oppossed to those figures enumerated by the ICRP, IAEA and other nuclear apologists), I will take the customary risk estimates, indicate their probable range of error, and then extend the definition to cover related events not recognized as 'detriments' by nuclear regulators.

"While nuclear regulators only take fatal cancers into consideration as 'detriments', others, especially those who endure a non-fatal cancer, may find their suffering equally worthy of consideration.

"And, limiting genetic effects to live born offspring does not wipe away the tears of a family that has endured a spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth."

– Sister Rosalie Bertell, PhD, GNSH, is President of the International Institute of Concern for Public Health, and Editor in Chief of International Perspectives in Public Health (IICPH)

(Editor's note – Following is Rosalie's figures on nuclear lethal & non-lethal cancer causes:)

(Exciting conclusion of Sister Rosalie's story, with letter of explanation, (follows below) – including the truth and true figures of Chernobyl casualties ...thousands of times higher than numbers falsified by nuclear industry regulatory apologists.)

Fukushima Caused An Additional 50,000 otherwise Unaccounted-for USA Newborn Deaths

Click pic for link

Mods: Download our free e-books to save the animals: (here) 

(top l) Depleted uranium (DU), more Rosalie, here  | (r) HAARP; (ll) Simpsons, continued, here | (lr) Alice in Wonderland: For the crime of eating a tart, the Queen demands, "Off with his head!" Surely, omnicide qualifies as well.

When I grow up, I want to destroy the world. I think I'll be a central banker; they're already doing it. Hmmm. They don't teach you that in school ...what a waste of time that was. What do I need life for, anyway? It's a waste of money.

Like it or not...

you are in a dream of  beauty & horror

You are about to enter this dream world of horror and beauty ...as never before. No matter how strong you are, you will never return. You will come back a different person like a werewolf or vampire changing others with your teeth and claws bringing them to eternal knowledge, as you change. 

Nuclear industry is a crime against children

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANET       ---------- 

 Pacific Nuclear  Newswire for Women 

Join Us On a Roller Coaster Ride to Save the Life Force & be a Dream Warrior

Women are an endangered species – if you won't fight to save beauty, all you'll have left is horror

The Life Force is suffering as never before ...can you feel it? When ionizing radiation mutates DNA, it doesn't care if it is plant, animal or human DNA. It destroys the Life Force and Divine Order of every living creature or plant to faithfully reproduce itself after its own kind. Ionizing radiation creates immune deficiency and hundreds of other diseases leading to terminal and non-terminal cancer. The Life Force needs you, your children, pets, gardens and children-to-be, safe and sound. It needs your love to survive. You need to know the truth they're not telling you. (continued)

Nuclear industry destroys Divine Order & the ability for women to have normal kids

Say goodbye to your friends and the person you were. You are someone, new ...all your own, a dream warrior. (See feature story, here ...and see, Nuclear Industry destroys Divine Order of a plant, animal or person to faithfully reproduce itself after its own kind, here)

Slideshow

Your family is now an endangered species

REACTOR FINDER (CLICK HERE)

To avoid cancer from the reactors, read the e-books

I'm too stupid to think that interlocking directorships, I mean dictatorships, of the western central banks should be held responsible for giving us cancer ...aren't I? Aren't you? After all, they gave us Santa Claws.

Nuclear industry is a crime against the unborn

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANET       ---------- 

 Pacific Nuclear  Newswire for Women 

Reactor Finder Surprise!

Every second each nuclear reactor chimney releases tritium & more radionuclides onto women & girls ...& into their ova, fetus & unborn child ... it can't be stopped

Tritium is gas, solid & liquid. The tritium hydrogen atom is a radionuclide. It replaces the hydrogen atom in water (H₂0) on contact. Therefore, you can not remove tritium from water, because it is the water. As a gas it touches your skin and penetrates into your water (you are 60%-70% water). (Tritium expose here)

Ever wish they told you the truth?

As a solid upon contact with your skin, vegetable garden, flowers, trees, crops or pets it is absorbed into the moisture. As liquid like in rain, rivers, fog, bottled water or in the shower, you absorb it. The short wave length of tritium is the same as the width of DNA, so it destroys your DNA and mutates it, creating birth defects and cancer. Tritium accumulates in your body & destroys your ova & fetus. continued here

Click pic for full story

And, while you're at it, here's another one just in case you don't get it:

here!

Nuclear industry is a crime against girls & babies

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANET       ---------- 

 Pacific Nuclear  Newswire for Women 

Women, Girls & Babies by Nuclear Reactors Get More Cancer

Women, pregnant women, babies-to-be, infants & girls within 25 miles of a nuclear reactor get more cancer than men or boys or those living farther away 

More     Evidence    Exhibits cell phone pdf  MS Word

Why are women not told? ...nuclear power is not safe & clean

...the infant mortality rate doubled in Seattle and British Columbia from fallout ...an organic farm in Southeast Portland shut down because its soil was too full of Fukushima fallout to grow vegetables and fruit for market ...there are 20,000 otherwise accounted for deaths in the U.S. since March 2011, (first fallout from three meltdowns from Fukushima Japan continuing unchecked, today and forever). Fallout never goes away, it accumulates, adding up ...it keeps killing practically, forever. more

World Nuclear Association

WNA reports millions of people live within 10 miles (16 km) of an operating reactor, more. The overall toll from nuclear industry, for all associated activities, is 1,200 million (1.2 billion) otherwise unaccounted-for deaths. (See featured story.) Real, accurate and up-to-date exposure rates in U.S. cities by reactors, here. 

The reason we are not told is because the nuclear industry is getting away with murder. Until you read these books

fff

(t) L.A. pediactric cancer map; (m) Sites currently affected by historical nuclear testing; (b) Location of reactors where women & girls within 25 miles have higher cancer rates than men or boys, or those living farther away (each reactor site is also a nuclear dump).

Will these kids make it? ...not the ones in the picture on top, but the ones in the nuclear testing red zones that go up into Canada where it's not important to warn them on the map ...cause they have free health care anyway, and we have to die because we can't afford our medicine. I like capitalism. It's like genocide in a bottle ...and, it's on sale.

(above pic) What about these kids in St. Louis County, Missouri? ...their parents? ...friends? ...pets? ...teachers? ...rabbis & priests & pastors? Do you think nuclear industry gives a shit if they live or die? ...or cares if nuclear gives you & your pets cancer & murders you? ...don't be an idiot. story, here

Nuclear industry is a crime against kids & the animal kingdom

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANET       ---------- 

 Pacific Nuclear  Newswire for Women 

California kids map pediatric cancers

Physicians for Social Responsibility - Los Angeles

PSR-LA directs nuclear threats program advocating protective health policies for nuclear industry weapons, nuclear energy & radiation regulations & ensures a proper cleanup of Santa Susana Field Lab, former nuclear & rocket testing facility polluted with nuclear industry radionuclides & chemical contamination. 

nuclear hotseat       ADD'l

Clan of One-Breasted Women  more

[Editor's note: (below) Additional interactive map indexed by State &/or zip code that lists other U.S. nuclear industry research & development sites; interactive map & legend of color codes here]

Staggering number of cancers, illnesses, & birth defects linked to nuclear waste

700 cases in four square miles in St. Louis County, Missouri – cancer & cojoined twin rates statistically impossible (story, here)

location, (click pic) 

This is in Beatty, Nevada ... let's see; there are 30 million one-ton rotting plastic bags full of nuclear waste in Japan ... guess we better burn it or toss it into the Pacific because that's what evil monsters do that want to destroy all life with DNA on Earth.

Lung cancers to start increasing in Pacific Northwest

Nov 16, 2014 | U.S. Nuclear Professor: Fukushima “a really major event here”, Washington had radioactive aerosols 100,000 times normal; “Far more bigger accident than we’re hearing” — Model shows West Coast completely blacked out due to particles covering area — Gundersen: Lung cancers to start increasing in Pacific Northwest (AUDIO) here

Nuclear industry is a crime against youth 

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANET       ---------- 

 Pacific Nuclear  Newswire for Women 

Nuclear Power is Not Safe & Clean

...did you know it's killing you & your kids & Congress & your doctors are lying to you & shortening your life? 

(story continued, here)

Do you really think these people think nuclear is safe & clean?

Mar 2, 2016 | TV: Shocking number of cancers around leaking nuclear plant near NYC … Tens of thousands of cases recently reported … “More than anywhere else in U.S.” … “Why is this story not being covered by everybody?” — Teacher: “I can’t believe the number of teachers who have gotten cancer” (VIDEOS) here

Oct 8, 2015 | UPI: ‘Skyrocketing’ cancer cases in Fukushima — AP: ‘Alarming’ cancer rates after nuclear disaster — Times: Child cancers up 5,000% — Radiation doses may be “considerably higher” than estimated — Expert: Cancer outbreak shows officials must now prepare for onset of leukemia, other diseases (VIDEO) here

Nov 4, 2013 | ABC Radio: “Cancer cases in Fukushima emerging faster than expected” — Japan Surgeon: I’m very angry, it’s very strange officials won’t release basic data (AUDIO) here

Nov 13, 2013 | More cancers in Fukushima children — Mother: We don’t know what’s actually going on, I can’t trust gov’t — TV: Private hospital finds cysts after ‘official’ tests were all clear (VIDEO) here

Jun 8, 2016 | Spike in number of U.S. sailors dying after Fukushima radiation exposure — Now over 400 veterans suffering serious illnesses — Former Japan Prime Minister breaks down crying, “This can’t be ignored any longer… Number of sick people increasing – symptoms worsening” (VIDEO) here

More: Washington State, here | Missouri, here | India, here | Russia, here | Japan, here

(click pic)

Gee, once my kids are dead, does that mean I don't have to support them anymore?

Nuclear industry is a crime against youth

Fairewinds video interviews & transcripts

-----------        HEALTH CARE FOR OUR PLANET       ---------- 

 Pacific Nuclear  Newswire for Women 

Children Suffer Nuclear Impact Worldwide

Contrary to cartoon superheroes: Kids don't get superpowers from routine-everyday nuclear industry reactor fallout, waste & accidents – instead: immune deficiency diseases & cancer

Maggie Gundersen, Chiho Kaneko & Caroline Phillips of Fairewinds.org interviewed by Margaret Harrington of CCTV Channel 17 in Burlington, Vermont, June 20, 2016: (here). Original transcript by Fairewinds; scroll down, (here). Formatted & edited oral history transcript by Nuclear Weather Forecast, (PDF, here) - or - (with MS Word search engine, footnotes, endnotes, charts & supplementary information, here)

| Children Suffer Nuclear Impact Worldwide | Extreme Nuclear Dangers | Tritium Expose | Smokescreen | Hottest Hot Particle | Hot Particles in Seattle & Boston | Nuclear Power Makes Global Warming Worse | EPA Sabotage: Wrecks Protective Action Guidelines |

Sister Rosalie Bertell

American scientist, author, environmental activist, epidemiologist, and Catholic nun

April 4, 1929 - June 14, 2012. Rosalie Bertell, American scientist, author, environmental activist, epidemiologist, and Catholic nun. Bertell was a Sister of the Grey Nuns of the Sacred Heart, best known for her work in the field of ionizing radiation, chemtrails, weather warfare and climate engineering ... and correcting then revising the harm count and death toll of the number of people getting fatal and non-fatal cancer from ionizing radiation — from 1 million according to the establishment, to 1.2 billion, (story, here; four of Sister's videos, Weather Wars, HAARP & Chemtrails - Parts 1-4, above; another, left; & another three, below)

Deep State Nuclear Mafia

Leuren Moret - "Fukushima HAARP tectonic nuclear attack by CIA, DOE, BP for London banks"

"Behind March 11, 2011 Fukushima nuclear meltdowns stand same war crimes racketeering org behind September 11, 2001, Hurricane Katrina (2005), Haiti earthquake (2010) & more HAARP-triggered covert ops to destabilize North America"

In an exclusive ExopoliticsTV interview by Alfred Lambremont Webre released May 9, 2011, independent scientist Leuren Moret has stated that the Fukushima HAARP tectonic nuclear attack was done by an international racketeering war crimes network within the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Department of Energy (DOE), and BP (British Petroleum) on behalf of City of London bankers.

Ms. Moret states that the group behind the March 11, 2011 events at the Fukushima nuclear plant is the same war crimes racketeering organization behind the false flag operations of September 11, 2001, Hurricane Katrina (2005), the Haiti earthquake (2010) and other HAARP-triggered false flag operations.

The Fukushima tectonic nuclear attack is an intentional genocidal depopulation of the northern and southern hemispheres, Ms. Moret states. The west coasts of the United States and Canada, Mexico, and Hawaii are being intentionally targeted by dangerous radiation from the March 11, 2011 tectonic warfare earthquake and nuclear meltdown events at Fukushima, Japan.

These areas of the United States and Canada, and Mexico, Ms. Moret indicates, are the major food producing areas for North America. Radiation from the Japan quake/nuclear meltdown events at Fukushima is intentionally being steered into these areas in order to dose the land and the food with radiation.

Danger of radiation in the rain

Ms. Moret warns that the U.S. government is covering up the radiation danger in North America, and stated that individuals should venture out in the rain with their bodies fully covered, including gloves.

During WWII, it was discovered that the most effective method of nuclear warfare was to detonate an atomic bomb in a raincloud, and let the radiation rain down on the target population.

The weather warfare capabilities of HAARP and the GWEN towers systems are being used to create weather patterns (such as tornadoes) and rain that bring radiation as high as in the Fukushima area of Japan on the southeast, midwest, southwest and west coasts of the United States.